Appendix: for the Choice of the blend off Gender–Number Combinations

Appendix: for the Choice of the blend off Gender–Number Combinations

Fuchs, Z., Polinsky, Meters., and Scontras, Grams. (2015). The fresh new differential logo out-of matter and you can sex within the Foreign-language. Linguist. Rev. 32, 703–737.

Hartsuiker, Roentgen., Schriefers, H., Bock, K., and you can Kikstra, Grams. Yards. (2003). Morphophonological affects towards framework out-of topic-verb arrangement. Mem. Cogn. 29, 1316–1326.

Heycock, C., and Zamparelli, Roentgen. (2005). Friends and you can colleagues: plurality, control, plus the design out-of DP. Nat. Lang. 13, 201–270.

Hinojosa, J., Martin-Loeches, Meters., Casado, P., Munoz, F., and Rubia, F. (2003). Similarities and differences when considering phrase structure and morphosyntactic violations in Foreign language: a meeting-related potentials data. Lang. Cogn. Techniques. 18, 113–142.

Igoa, J. Meters., Garcia-Albea, J. Elizabeth., and you will Sanches-Casas, Roentgen. (1999). Gender-count dissociation in the sentence manufacturing during the Spanish. Ital. J. Linguist. 11, 163–196.

Krstev, C., and you may Vitas, D. (2005). “Corpus. and you can Lexicon – Shared Incompletness,” when you look at the Procedures of your Corpus Linguistics Conference, eds P. Danielsson and you can Meters. Wagenmakers, Liverpool.

Malko, A., and you can Slioussar, N. (2013). “Destination mistakes during the gender agreement: Facts of Russian,” when you look at the Procedures Specialized Approaches to Slavic Linguistics: The next Indiana Meeting, eds S. Franks, et al. (Ann Arbor: Michigan School Press), 162–175.

). “History conjunct contract inside the Slovenian,” during the Process out of Official Remedies for Slavic linguistics 2006, eds Rpton, Meters. Goledzinowska, and you may U. Savchenko (Ann Arbor: Michigan Slavic Publications), 210-227.

Mitic, I., and you can Arsenijevic, B. (2019). Architectural ambiguity and you can optionality out-of agreement designs within the Bosnian/Croatian/Serbian conjunct arrangement. A J. Gen. Linguist. 4:6.

Nevins, An excellent., Dillon, B., Malhotra, S., and you can Phillips, C. (2007). This new role regarding function-amount and show-enter in running Hindi verb arrangement abuses. Head Res. 1164, 81–94.

Puskar, Z., and you can Murphy, Good. (2015). “Nearest conjunct contract inside serbo-croatian: a guideline-purchasing account,” during the Subjects within InfL. Linguistische Arbeitsberichte (LAB), Vol. 92, eds A good. Assmann, S. Lender, D. Georgi, T. Klein, P. Weisser, and you can E. Zimmermann (Leipzig: Universitat Leipzig), 441–482.

Vigliocco, Grams., Butterworth, B., and you may Garrett, Meters. F. (1996). Subject-verb arrangement into the Foreign-language and you will English: differences in the role away from abstract limits. Knowledge 61, 261–298.


Willer-Silver, J., Arsenijevic, B., Batinic, M., Becker, Meters., Cordalija, N., Kresic, Yards., et al. (2018). Whenever linearity is available more ladder when you look at the syntax. PNAS 115, 495–five-hundred. doi: /pnas.1712729115

The four rationally you can easily combos as well as their characteristics try illustrated for the (21)

Willer-Silver, J., Arsenijevic, B., Batinic, M., Cordalija, N., Kresic, Meters., Leko, N., et al. (2016). Morphosyntactic production of coordination agreement in Southern Slavic–a comparative investigation. J. Slavic Linguist. 24, 187–224.

So it part describes specific tech issues about the options produced in the design of our experiment, inside light of the unique services of South carolina morphology. It’s lined up primarily for those selecting brand new theoretical and you will detailed linguistic, in the place of psycholinguistic regions of the analysis.

In our experimental framework, i’ve capitalized on the proven fact that when you look at the Sc NSg nouns stop in a choice of -elizabeth or in -o, and this its plural results in -an effective, when you are at the same time FSg nouns bring about -a beneficial, and their plural variations cause -elizabeth. That it yields a beneficial entered, but really partial syncretism.

The combination from NSg and FPl makes it possible for the synthesis of limited sets between a great syncretic and you can ukrainian order bride a non-syncretic pair of nouns, because the mix of NPl and you may FSg makes it possible for just one chance, that’s syncretic.

We utilized limited pairs such as (20a) inside our crucial stimuli. The brand new selected choice, yet not, allows for one or two sandwich-choice, depending on and this sex–number integration appear due to the fact very first, and you will and this since past conjunct. This was decided by some other comparable consideration.

New verb contains the fresh new endings: -o for NSg, -an as NPl and you can FSg, or -age to have FPl – we.e., you can easily identify NSg of FPl toward verb. This means that, besides the unambiguously default male end -i, whenever an effective verb from inside the -age was introduced, we were sure it actually was FPl, and in case an excellent verb inside -o is introduced, i know it absolutely was NSg. Although not, when a beneficial verb during the -a got introduced – it had been uncertain if this is plural, agreeing into the gender on very first conjunct (NPl), or it was one and you can concurred for the gender for the history conjunct (FSg).

Appendix: for the Choice of the blend off Gender–Number Combinations

Deja una respuesta

Tu dirección de correo electrónico no será publicada. Los campos obligatorios están marcados con *

Scroll hacia arriba